Black v. United States Army

572 F. App'x 255
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2014·No. No. 14-1194·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Reid Black appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), Black’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Black v. U.S. Army, No. 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA, 2014 WL 257275 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [256] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. United States Army, 572 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2014).

572 F. App'x 255 (Black v. United States Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related