Black v. Trembly
209 N.C. 743
Opinion
It would seem that under the decision in Jordan v. Sigmon, 194 N. C., 707, 140 S. E., 620, the defendant is in no position to complain at the judgment entered below. Compare Speight v. Speight, 208 N. C., 132, 179 S. E., 461.
The eases cited by appellant, Dixon v. Hooker, 199 N. C., 673, 155 S. E., 567, and Allen v. Smith, 183 N. C., 222, 111 S. E., 11, were given due weight by the trial court. They are not controlling on the facts presently presented.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Black v. Trembly, 209 N.C. 743 (N.C. 1936).
209 N.C. 743 (Black v. Trembly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixon v. . Hooker
155 S.E. 567 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Speight v. . Speight
179 S.E. 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Jordan v. . Sigmon
140 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Allen v. . Smith
111 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)