Black v. Tompkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Black v. Tompkins

39 S.W. 553, 63 Ark. 502, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 135

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 27, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 39 S.W. 553 (Black v. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. Tompkins, 39 S.W. 553, 63 Ark. 502, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 135 (Ark. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question of law involved in this action was decided in Reeve v. Ladies' Building Association, 56 Ark. 335, and Taylor v. Van Buren Building Association, ib. 340. According to the opinion in those cases, there was and is no usury in the contracts sued on.

The decree of the chancery court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to the court to foreclose the mortgage sued on; ascertaining the amount due thereon according to the rule stated in Roberts v. American Building & Loan Association, 62 Ark. 572.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question of law involved in this action was decided in Reeve v. Ladies' Building Association, 56 Ark. 335, and Taylor v. Van Buren Building Association, ib. 340. According to the opinion in those cases, there was and is no usury in the contracts sued on.

The decree of the chancery court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to the court to foreclose the mortgage sued on; ascertaining the amount due thereon according to the rule stated in Roberts v. American Building & Loan Association, 62 Ark. 572.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.W. 553, 63 Ark. 502, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-tompkins-ark-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack