Black v. Teel

405 So. 2d 1068, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21697
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1981·No. No. 81-277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury suit. Because we find the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant when there was evidence at [1069]*1069trial which could have supported a verdict against the defendant we must reverse the judgment and remand this case for a new trial. Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Laird v. Potter, 367 So.2d 642 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 347 (Fla.1979); Newsome v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 350 So.2d 825 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). This decision applies to both reasons given by the trial judge in his order directing a verdict. We find no error in the judge’s order denying the motion in limine regarding the blood alcohol test results.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. Teel, 405 So. 2d 1068, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

405 So. 2d 1068 (Black v. Teel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Air Conditioners, Inc. v. Colonial Supply Co.
421 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)