Black v. State

11 Tenn. 588
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1832
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Tenn. 588 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. State, 11 Tenn. 588 (Tenn. 1832).

Opinion

Peck, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion, the evidence offered was properly rejected. The circuit judge, in the charge to the jury, has given the proper reasons for it. With the charge of the court we accord. Men are not permitted to redress tfteir own wrongs, or to restore themselves to lost rights at their own will and pleasure; others have rights also. The process of the law and the courts, are open to them, and to these resort must he had, not to force and acts of violence. 2 Tenn. Rep. 97. It was supposed that the indictment did not show a possession of the house by Marshall, at the time of the entry; that is not so. The bill charges, that he was then and there possessed of the house, and that the negro, with force and arms, with clubs, knives, &c. was taken from and out of the house, and out of the possession of said Marshall. It is a sufficient indictment, and the charge of the court to the jury, and the opinion upon the admission of the evidence offered being correct, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. State
454 S.W.2d 187 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Tenn. 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-tenn-1832.