Black v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Black v. State

563 S.W.3d 853

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2018

DocketWD 80298

StatusPublished

This text of 563 S.W.3d 853 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. State, 563 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Mark Black appeals a Jackson County circuit court judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Black was convicted by a jury on two counts of the class B felony of first-degree assault, and two counts of the unclassified felony of armed *854criminal action. Mr. Black alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to and moving to suppress the two witness identifications. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Mark Black appeals a Jackson County circuit court judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Black was convicted by a jury on two counts of the class B felony of first-degree assault, and two counts of the unclassified felony of armed *854criminal action. Mr. Black alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to and moving to suppress the two witness identifications. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 S.W.3d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-moctapp-2018.