Black v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Black v. State

563 S.W.3d 853

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2018·No. WD 80298·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Mark Black appeals a Jackson County circuit court judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Black was convicted by a jury on two counts of the class B felony of first-degree assault, and two counts of the unclassified felony of armed *854criminal action. Mr. Black alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to and moving to suppress the two witness identifications. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Mark Black appeals a Jackson County circuit court judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Black was convicted by a jury on two counts of the class B felony of first-degree assault, and two counts of the unclassified felony of armed *854criminal action. Mr. Black alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to and moving to suppress the two witness identifications. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Black v. State, 563 S.W.3d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

563 S.W.3d 853 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.