Black v. State

754 So. 2d 792, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3427, 2000 WL 294493
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2000·No. No. 4D00-0680·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence made pursuant to rule 3.800(a) 1 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm. See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)(en banc), holding that scoresheet errors not apparent from the face of the scoresheet are not correctable on a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See also Lomont v. State, 506 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), holding that sentencing score-sheet computation error based upon disputed prior offenses should have been raised at sentencing or on direct appeal and not raised in a motion for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. State, 754 So. 2d 792, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3427, 2000 WL 294493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

754 So. 2d 792 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
899 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Mead v. State
769 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)