Black v. State

142 So. 599, 106 Fla. 15
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 142 So. 599 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. State, 142 So. 599, 106 Fla. 15 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting' six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion, as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

*16 Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
149 So. 480 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 So. 599, 106 Fla. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-fla-1932.