Black v. State ex rel. Johnson

112 So. 2d 792, 269 Ala. 269, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 28, 1959
Docket8 Div. 961
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 112 So. 2d 792 (Black v. State ex rel. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. State ex rel. Johnson, 112 So. 2d 792, 269 Ala. 269, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 481 (Ala. 1959).

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

The defendant appeals from a proceeding instituted by the State on relation of Honorable George C. Johnson as Solicitor of the 8th Judicial Circuit, and Honorable Ralph E. Tate, Solicitor of the Morgan County Court of Morgan County, wherein a decree of condemnation of the appellant’s automobile was rendered by the Circuit Court in Equity of Morgan County. A threshold question must dispose of the appeal. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because (1) The assignments of error were not served on the Attorney General who represents the State in this appellate proceeding, and (2) The brief of appellant was not filed in this Court within 30 days after the transcript of the record had been filed. Both points are well taken.

It is essential that the Attorney General be served with a copy of the assignments of error when the State is a party on appeal. Rule 1, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix; Thompson v. State ex rel. Borders, 268 Ala. 483, 107 So.2d 890, and cases cited.

Likewise, in all civil appeals, the appellant must file the briefs with the clerk of the appellate court within 30 days after the transcript of the record has been filed and upon failure to so file, the appeal must be dismissed or the case affirmed. Rule 12, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court; Ex parte N.A.A.C.P. (N.A.A.C.P. v. Jones), 268 Ala. 504, 109 So.2d 140; Tipton v. Tipton, 267 Ala. 64, 100 So.2d 14; Phalen v. Fort, 266 Ala. 213, 95 So.2d 401; Mil[270]*270ler v. Wood, 265 Ala. 698, 90 So.2d 927; Gamble v. Lapsley, 265 Ala. 695, 90 So.2d 926.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Domit Construction Co. v. Town of Mountain Woods
186 So. 2d 124 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Moore v. Moore
182 So. 2d 855 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. State
150 So. 2d 677 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Muncy v. General Investment Company
145 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Agricola v. Wimberly & Thomas Hardware Co.
124 So. 2d 838 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 2d 792, 269 Ala. 269, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-ex-rel-johnson-ala-1959.