Black v. Rogers

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Black v. Rogers

68 Me. 574, 1878 Me. LEXIS 163

DecidedDecember 27, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 68 Me. 574 (Black v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. Rogers, 68 Me. 574, 1878 Me. LEXIS 163 (Me. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Walton, J.

We do not feel quite clear that an attestation upon the face of a note should be held to apply to a signature upon the back of it, unless the attestation clause expressly so [575]*575states. But, however that may be, we do not think the vei’dict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to justify us in setting it aside.

Motion overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Appleton, C. J., Babeows, Danfobth and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton, J.

We do not feel quite clear that an attestation upon the face of a note should be held to apply to a signature upon the back of it, unless the attestation clause expressly so [575]*575states. But, however that may be, we do not think the vei’dict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to justify us in setting it aside.

Motion overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Appleton, C. J., Babeows, Danfobth and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 Me. 574, 1878 Me. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-rogers-me-1878.