Black v. Rogers

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Black v. Rogers

68 Me. 574, 1878 Me. LEXIS 163

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 27, 1878·Published

Opinion

Walton, J.

We do not feel quite clear that an attestation upon the face of a note should be held to apply to a signature upon the back of it, unless the attestation clause expressly so [575]*575states. But, however that may be, we do not think the vei’dict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to justify us in setting it aside.

Motion overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Appleton, C. J., Babeows, Danfobth and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton, J.

We do not feel quite clear that an attestation upon the face of a note should be held to apply to a signature upon the back of it, unless the attestation clause expressly so [575]*575states. But, however that may be, we do not think the vei’dict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to justify us in setting it aside.

Motion overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

Appleton, C. J., Babeows, Danfobth and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Black v. Rogers, 68 Me. 574, 1878 Me. LEXIS 163 (Me. 1878).

Pincite

68 Me. 574 (Black v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.