Black v. . Ray

18 N.C. 334
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 N.C. 334 (Black v. . Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. . Ray, 18 N.C. 334 (N.C. 1835).

Opinion

Ruffin, Chief Justice.

— We think the judgment must be affirmed. The gift of the slave and land, and all the other articles, is in the same sentence. There is but a single disposing word, “ bequeath,” in the beginning of the clause, which extends to each thing given; and there is but one expression directing the quantity of estate, *336 “ daring her life-time” which is in the end of it, and neces-arily controls the interest in each subject of the gift. The only estate given, being for the life of the widow, the assent of the executors could go no further, and consequently the reversion remained in them. The Anonymous case in 2 Hay. Rep. 161, is an authority upon both points, if one were needed on either. We suppose the last objection was not seriously taken.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. . Best
142 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Jordan v. . Sigmon
140 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Sneed v. . Harris
4 N.C. 672 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1817)
Dunwoodie v. . Carrington
4 N.C. 355 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.C. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-ray-nc-1835.