Black v. McMurtry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Black v. McMurtry

1 Miss. 389

DecidedJune 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Miss. 389 (Black v. McMurtry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. McMurtry, 1 Miss. 389 (Mich. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT — by

Chiej? Justice TURNER.

This single question is presented by this verdict, for the consideration of the court: whether the assignee of a promissory note is vested with the legal interest therein, from the date of the assignment? And we are of opinion that he is, with the single exception contained in the statute, made in behalf of the maker; and the jury having found the fact of the assignment of the notes in question, on the 7th January, 1830, to the defendant, in this issue, A. T.McMurtry, by Tbomas WrenJííWpS^TOpUSl^otes; which was some days previous to the service W. Calmes, the maker of the notes, it is conside^d that judgment^bp |en-dered on the special verdict, in favor of the said .

We are of opinion that choses in action are n|t affected by tth which provides that a judgment shall be a lies; party against whom judgment is rendered, inasmiiS ject to the plaintiff’s executiom

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT — by

Chiej? Justice TURNER.

This single question is presented by this verdict, for the consideration of the court: whether the assignee of a promissory note is vested with the legal interest therein, from the date of the assignment? And we are of opinion that he is, with the single exception contained in the statute, made in behalf of the maker; and the jury having found the fact of the assignment of the notes in question, on the 7th January, 1830, to the defendant, in this issue, A. T.McMurtry, by Tbomas WrenJííWpS^TOpUSl^otes; which was some days previous to the service W. Calmes, the maker of the notes, it is conside^d that judgment^bp |en-dered on the special verdict, in favor of the said .

We are of opinion that choses in action are n|t affected by tth which provides that a judgment shall be a lies; party against whom judgment is rendered, inasmiiS ject to the plaintiff’s executiom

All the judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Miss. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-mcmurtry-miss-1831.