Black v. . McAulay
This text of 50 N.C. 375 (Black v. . McAulay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is settled, that when a limitation over is made, “ if the taker of the first estate, dies before arriving at full age, or without children, the word “ or” is construed to mean “ and,” so that the limitation over does not take effect, unless both contingencies happen, and the first estate becomes absolute upon the happening of either; 2 Eearne, 97, Jarman on Wills, 444.
Our case is stronger; for treating the -word “ or,” as used in the disjunctive, when the first contingency happened, that is, when Adeline arrived at the age of twenty-one, her estate be *377 came absolute, as the other contingency — her death “ without issue,” taken alone, made the limitation over too remote, according to the principles of the common law.
There is no errorr.
Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 N.C. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-mcaulay-nc-1858.