Black v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2024
Docket7:24-cv-01745
StatusUnknown

This text of Black v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District (Black v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

THOMAS, DROHAN, WAXMAN, PETIGROW & MAYLE, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 2517 ROUTE 52 HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NEW YORK 12533 DANIEL PETIGROW OF COUNSEL STUART S. WAXMAN* JAMES P. DROHAN NEELANJAN CHOUDHURY D’'ANDREA & GOLDSTEIN DAVID H. STRONG JOAN M, GILBRIDE MELISSA N. KNAPP** ALLISON E. SMITH ree ax: (848) 592.7020 PAMELA D. BASS™ NINA MASSEN www. tdwpm.com CASSIDY E. ALLISON AIMEE B. KATONA GRACE C. MEI

“ADMITTED IN NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT October 30, 2024

VIA ECF Honorable Kenneth M. Karas United States District Judge Southern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, New York 10601 Re: MB. and J.B. v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free Sch. Dist., Case No. 24 Civ. 1745 (KMK) Your Honor: We represent Defendant Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District in the above- referenced action brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), in which Plaintiffs challenge an administrative determination of a State Review Officer (“SRO”), following an impartial hearing held pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f) and related state law, concerning the placement of a student with a disability. I write in further support of Defendant’s motion for leave to file the entire administrative hearing record under seal and to address the specific concerns raised by the Court (ECF No. 23). As has been expressly stated by at least one federal judge in the Southern District of New York, filing the entirety of the hearing record under seal “is common in IDEA cases.” B.D. v. Eldred Cent. Sch. Dist., 661 F. Supp. 3d 299, 305 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) (Halpern, J.); S.B. v. Goshen Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 20 Civ. 9167 (PMH), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164057, at *3 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2022) (Halpern, J.). Other judges in this District appear to routinely approve requests to file the entire administrative record under seal in IDEA cases. See, e.g., Y.S.v.N.Y. City Dep’t of Educ., No. 23 Civ. 7317 (JPC), 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179240, at *6n. 1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2024) (“[t]he following background facts are drawn from the underlying administrative record which was filed under seal”); Scheff v. N.Y. City Dep’t of Educ., 680 F. Supp. 3d 354,

Honorable Kenneth M. Karas Page 2 M.B. v. Katonah-Lewisboro UFSD, 24 Civ. 1745 (KMK) October 30, 2024

361 (S.D.N.Y. 2023); Donohue v. N.Y. City Dep't of Educ., No. 20 Civ. 1942 (ALC)(KHP), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189873, at #22 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2021) (“[t]he complete administrative record was submitted under seal”). Additionally, in previous IDEA actions, Your Honor has also granted requests to file the entire administrative hearing record under seal. See Y.N. v. Bd. of Educ., No. 17 Civ. 4356 (KMK), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164453, at *] n. 1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2018); W.A. v. Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist., 219 F. Supp. 3d 421, 453 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). In this instance, the hearing record consists of more than 2300 pages, much of which, including the exhibits and hearing transcript, contain extensive information about the student, including personally identifying information and copies of educational records, that fall under the protections of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. Redacting this information would be unduly burdensome and may likely not be effective to maintain confidentiality. Moreover, the only portion of the hearing record that has previously been made available to the public is the decision of the SRO, which is available on the public website of the Office of State Review, and does not contain any personally identifying information. Therefore, given the impracticality of redacting protected information in the hearing record, and the common practice in the Southern District of New York of filing the hearing record under seal in IDEA cases, Defendant respectfully requests leave to file the entire administrative hearing record in this action under seal. Alternatively, if leave is not granted before October 31, 2024, Defendant requests an extension of time to file the administrative hearing record to provide time for Plaintiffs to be heard on this issue. For the reasons noted herein, the administrative record in this case may be filed_under seal. bespeely, i, = S$p-Ordere Alin. Ve Lee? = Steven L. Banks 10/30/24 cc: Meredith Black, Esq. (by ECF) Plaintiff J.B. (by ECF) Cassidy E. Allison, Esq. (by ECF)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W.A. v. Hendrick Hudson Central School District
219 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D. New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Black v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-katonah-lewisboro-union-free-school-district-nysd-2024.