Black v. Industrial Commission

65 N.E.2d 798, 393 Ill. 187, 1946 Ill. LEXIS 299
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 1946
DocketNo. 29275. Judgment reversed; award set aside.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 65 N.E.2d 798 (Black v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Industrial Commission, 65 N.E.2d 798, 393 Ill. 187, 1946 Ill. LEXIS 299 (Ill. 1946).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the court:

By this writ of error plaintiffs in error seek the reversal of a judgment of the circuit court of Champaign county confirming, on certiorari, the decision of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation to defendant in error Frank Cloud.

The facts, not in dispute, are that plaintiff in error-Russell Black, Commissioner of Highways of the town of Sadorus, let a contract to one Elmer Larson to gravel certain roads in the town of Sadorus. Larson sublet the contract to one C. J. Cavanaugh. The latter hired trucks, including that of one John Hall, to haul gravel. Cloud was employed by Hall as a truck driver and on July 22, 1936, hauled gravel on that job. All parties were under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. On that day Cloud’s truck collided head on with another loaded truck, driven by an employee of another contractor on the job. Cloud was severely injured.

On June 16, 1937, Cloud filed an application for adjustment of claim with the Industrial Commission, claiming compensation from his employer Hall and the town of Sadorus. The claim was numbered 242888.

On July 19, 1937, lacking three days of one year after the injury, Cloud filed an amended application of claim, adding one J. V. Patterson and plaintiff in error Russell Black, commissioner of highways of the town of Sadorus, as parties respondent. On November 24, 1937, more than a year after the injury, Cloud filed a second amended application for adjustment of claim, in which he added as parties respondent, Black’s insurance carrier, the Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, J. V. Patterson, Elmer Larson, C. J. Cavanaugh and Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Cavanaugh’s .insurance carrier.

On January 7, 1938, C. J. Cavanaugh and his insurance carrier, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, filed a written motion to dismiss the claim as to them on the ground that the Statute of Limitations had run, as the amended claim making them parties respondent was not filed within one year after the date of the accidental injury. This motion was on July 5, 1938, denied and on certiorari the circuit court on December 16, 1938, reversed the order of the commission and ordered the application dismissed as to those respondents. On May 10, 1938, plaintiffs in error Black, Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, and the town of Sadorus filed their motions to dismiss, on the ground that' there was no liability under the act, on the part of Black as commissioner of highways, or on the part of the town of Sadorus. On the hearing on these motions certified copies of insurance of Elmer Larson, the original contractor, and C. J. Cavanaugh, the subcontractor, were filed, showing that they carried workmen’s compensation insurance at the time the contract and subcontract were let. Hall, Cloud’s employer, carried no insurance. Although the commission, as we have seen, denied the motion of Cavanaugh and his insurance carrier, The Bituminous Casualty Corporation, to dismiss, it did not pass upon the motions of plaintiffs in error or that of the town of Sadorus.

On March 10, 1939, Cloud’s claim for compensation was heard before one A. V. Becker, an arbitrator, and the testimony of defendant in error, his employer, Hall, and several other witnesses was heard. Hall testified that on July 22, 1936, he carried no compensation insurance. At the close of defendant in error’s evidence motions of plaim tiffs in error, Black, the town of Sadorus, and the Standard Accident Insurance Company, were again made for dismissal of the claim on the ground there was nothing in the record on which to base liability as to them. The hearing was closed and on March 24, 1939, arbitrator Becker entered his decision awarding Cloud compensation from Hall, and held “that each and every respondent other than John Hall is hereby dismissed as party respondent in this cause.”

As no petition for its review was filed by any of the parties thereto, this award and order of dismissal became final. On July 21, 1939, on Cloud’s petition, the circuit court of Champaign county entered judgment in his favor against Hall for the amount of the award and for attorney’s fees. The record in the circuit court showed that Hall had theretofore paid defendant in error, on account of the award, a total of $58.25.

On September 1, 1939, Cloud and Hall'filed a common-law suit in the circuit court of Champaign county against one Philip B. Kennedy, plaintiff in error Black, and C. J. Cavanaugh. Except for Kennedy, these defendants were parties to Cloud’s application for compensation. The outcome of that suit is not shown in the record.

On February 4, 1941, Cloud filed a petition in the circuit court of Champaign county praying for leave to file a counterclaim in the certiorari proceedings in which that court had, on December 16, 1938, reversed the order of the commission denying the motion of Cavanaugh and his insurance carrier, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, to dismiss defendant in error’s claim, and ordering that claim dismissed as to them. On February 4, 1941, Cloud also asked leave to file a “counterclaim” against Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, Black and the town of Sadorus. The circuit court denied the petitions to file these counterclaims on the ground the court was without jurisdiction.

On February 4, 1941, Cloud also filed in the circuit court of Champaign county a motion that the proceedings be remanded to the Industrial Commission with instructions to consider the liability of the persons sought to be made defendant on the proposed counterclaim, under section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. This motion was denied on the ground that nothing appeared in the recprd to indicate that the questions raised on the counterclaims were presented to the Industrial Commission, and, as no appeal was taken and the court had only appellate jurisdiction, such motion was denied.

On February 6, 1941, defendant in error filed a claim with the Industrial Commission captioned “Claim Against Employer of Sub-Contractor,” in which he named as respondents all parties named as respondents in the original and amended applications and in addition the United States Eidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation. In this last venture he alleged his injury, his employment by Hall, his recovery of an award for compensation and final judgment thereon in the amount of $4110.53. He alleged that all parties except United States - Fidelity and Guaranty Company were parties to the proceedings before arbitrator Becker and that none of the parties had questioned the rendition of the judgment against Hall; that under section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act every employer and independent contractor is required to see that insurance is carried by such independent contractor or subcontractor, but that Black, the town of Sadorus, Cavanaugh, and Larson failed to require Hall to carry workmen’s compensation insurance upon his employees and that Cloud was not informed of the nonexistence of such insurance upon John Hall until after the return of execution “unsatisfied” and until diligent search and investigation were made, and that he acquired that information less than six .months prior to the filing of the present claim. He alleges notice of the accident within statutory time and that Hall had made certain payments, the last being on November 9, 1940.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eschbaugh v. Industrial Commission
677 N.E.2d 438 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1996)
Eschbaugh v. Industrial Com'n
677 N.E.2d 438 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1996)
Creel v. Industrial Commission
301 N.E.2d 275 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1973)
Ray v. Industrial Commission
284 N.E.2d 272 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1972)
Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Commission
221 N.E.2d 289 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1966)
Lake State Engineering Co. v. Industrial Commission
202 N.E.2d 18 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1964)
Armijo v. United States Casualty Company
357 P.2d 57 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1960)
International Harvester Co. v. Industrial Commission
103 N.E.2d 109 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1951)
Hexdall v. State
19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 171 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1950)
Lewandowski v. State
19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 39 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1949)
Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission
82 N.E.2d 449 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1948)
Benner v. State
16 Ill. Ct. Cl. 104 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.E.2d 798, 393 Ill. 187, 1946 Ill. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-industrial-commission-ill-1946.