Black v. Huttmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Black v. Huttmann

12 A.D.2d 636, 210 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 636 (Black v. Huttmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. Huttmann, 12 A.D.2d 636, 210 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff Howard Black appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 1959, as, on reconsideration, vacates the preference previously granted under rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Pette, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order, and to reinstate the preference, upon the ground that the record presents evidence of injuries and special damages sufficient to warrant a rule 9 preference. Brennan, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff Howard Black appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 1959, as, on reconsideration, vacates the preference previously granted under rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Pette, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order, and to reinstate the preference, upon the ground that the record presents evidence of injuries and special damages sufficient to warrant a rule 9 preference. Brennan, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 636, 210 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-huttmann-nyappdiv-1960.