Black v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Black v. Hughes

77 A.D.2d 750, 431 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12497

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 750 (Black v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. Hughes, 77 A.D.2d 750, 431 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 12, 1978. The board found "based on the credible evidence and [751]*751testimony in the record, that William F. Slack agent for Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Co. bound Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Company for workmen’s compensation coverage, and this coverage was in effect on 11/19/74 the date of the accident. Therefor Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Co. is the liable carrier in this case.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs against appellant Merchants Mutual Insurance Company. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 12, 1978. The board found "based on the credible evidence and [751]*751testimony in the record, that William F. Slack agent for Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Co. bound Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Company for workmen’s compensation coverage, and this coverage was in effect on 11/19/74 the date of the accident. Therefor Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Co. is the liable carrier in this case.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs against appellant Merchants Mutual Insurance Company. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 750, 431 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-hughes-nyappdiv-1980.