Black v. Homœopathic Mutual Insurance

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 897
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Assuming that the plaintiffs herein have stated a cause of action which will, by a stretch of the most exuberant imagination, be indulged in, the case contains no evidence whatever of any intention on the part of the defendant to dispose of its property with the intent to defraud its creditors, and as the attachment was granted upon that ground without any evidence to support it, it was properly vacated and the order expressive of that result was proper and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. Homœopathic Mutual Insurance, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 897 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 897 (Black v. Homœopathic Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.