Black v. Hobart Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Black v. Hobart Trust Co.

56 A. 1131, 65 N.J. Eq. 769, 20 Dickinson 769, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 308

DecidedNovember 16, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A. 1131 (Black v. Hobart Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. Hobart Trust Co., 56 A. 1131, 65 N.J. Eq. 769, 20 Dickinson 769, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 308 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, in his opinion filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 415.

For affirmance — Ti-ib Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze., Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom, Green, Gray — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A. 1131, 65 N.J. Eq. 769, 20 Dickinson 769, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-hobart-trust-co-nj-1903.