Black v. Goodin

1 Cal. Unrep. 155
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1864
DocketNo. 404
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 155 (Black v. Goodin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Goodin, 1 Cal. Unrep. 155 (Cal. 1864).

Opinion

SANDERSON, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial. The motion seems to have been made upon something supposed to be a statement, but the record contains nothing which we can regard as such. There is nothing which purports to be a statement, nor is there anything agreed to by the parties, or settled by the judge, or certified to be correct as such by either. By examining the record and consulting the one hundred and ninety-fifth section of the Practice Act, counsel for appellants will readily perceive that the record in no respect complies Avith the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

"We concur: Sawyer, J.; Currey, J.; Shafter, J.; Rhodes, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Unrep. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-goodin-cal-1864.