Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield

1922 OK 327, 210 P. 1023, 87 Okla. 297, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 303
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 28, 1922
Docket10379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1922 OK 327 (Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield, 1922 OK 327, 210 P. 1023, 87 Okla. 297, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 303 (Okla. 1922).

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This cause was submitted upon the 13th day of June, 1922, and on said date the plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days in which to file brief, defendant in error 30 days thereafter to file answer brief. No briefs have been filed by plaintiffs in error, and no excuse is offered for failure to file the same.

This court, in the case of Sequoyah Club v. Ward, County Treasurer, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747, announced the rule as follows:

“Where plaintiff in error fails to serve and file brief as prescribed by rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi, 165 Pac. vii), no excuse being offered therefor, the judgment, of the • trial court should be affirmed.”

Under' the rule announced in the above case, the judgment is affirmed.

KANE JOHNSON, MILLER, KENNA-MER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Krow
1938 OK 577 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1922 OK 327, 210 P. 1023, 87 Okla. 297, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-first-nat-bank-of-grandfield-okla-1922.