Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield
1922 OK 327, 210 P. 1023, 87 Okla. 297, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 303
Opinion
This cause was submitted upon the 13th day of June, 1922, and on said date the plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days in which to file brief, defendant in error 30 days thereafter to file answer brief. No briefs have been filed by plaintiffs in error, and no excuse is offered for failure to file the same.
This court, in the case of Sequoyah Club v. Ward, County Treasurer, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747, announced the rule as follows:
“Where plaintiff in error fails to serve and file brief as prescribed by rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi, 165 Pac. vii), no excuse being offered therefor, the judgment, of the • trial court should be affirmed.”
Under' the rule announced in the above case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield, 1922 OK 327, 210 P. 1023, 87 Okla. 297, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 303 (Okla. 1922).
1922 OK 327 (Black v. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Krow
1938 OK 577 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)