Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

119 So. 521, 97 Fla. 19
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 So. 521 (Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville, 119 So. 521, 97 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and in *20 speeted, and tbe Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park
149 So. 409 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Scott v. Nat. City Bk. of Tampa
139 So. 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 So. 521, 97 Fla. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-first-nat-bank-of-brooksville-fla-1927.