Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

Supreme Court of Florida

Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

119 So. 521, 97 Fla. 19

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 22, 1927·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and in *20 speeted, and tbe Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and in *20 speeted, and tbe Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, JJ., concur.

Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville, 119 So. 521, 97 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

119 So. 521 (Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related