Black v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.
101 A. 644, 257 Pa. 273, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 722
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 19, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 254
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 101 A. 644 (Black v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Black v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co., 101 A. 644, 257 Pa. 273, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 722 (Pa. 1917).
Opinion
The Act of 1895 clearly barred the right of either of the plaintiffs to recover in this action, brought more than five years after the injuries to the wife were sustained, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below refusing to take off the nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. Baker
217 N.W.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974)
Johnson v. Esso Standard Oil Company
181 F. Supp. 431 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1960)
Rex v. Hutner
140 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway
146 F. Supp. 926 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
Markel v. Glassmeyer
288 N.W. 821 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1939)
Poulos v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc.
198 A. 372 (U.S. District Court, 1937)
Cliff v. Seligman & Latz
38 F.2d 179 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)
Freed v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
93 Pa. Super. 72 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 A. 644, 257 Pa. 273, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-eastern-pennsylvania-railways-co-pa-1917.