Black v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, LLC
This text of 713 N.W.2d 768 (Black v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Henry BLACK, Ron Palmer, Delia De-LaFuente-Durham, Don Petrow, Jeff Sheehan, Natalie Pacholuk, Guadalupe Arboleya, Marianne Kornylo, and Carol Linke, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for clarification of its order. Specifically, the Court of Appeals shall state whether it intended to vacate the Oakland Circuit Court's order denying defendant's motion to strike and to order the trial court to engage in an MRE 702 inquiry regarding plaintiffs' proposed expert testimony before issuing a new ruling on defendant's motion to strike. On the Court's own motion, we further ORDER that the proceedings in the Oakland Circuit Court are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 N.W.2d 768, 475 Mich. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-daimlerchrysler-services-north-america-llc-mich-2006.