Black v. City of Manistee

64 N.W. 868, 107 Mich. 60, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1084
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 64 N.W. 868 (Black v. City of Manistee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. City of Manistee, 64 N.W. 868, 107 Mich. 60, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1084 (Mich. 1895).

Opinion

Hooker, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment upon a verdict directed by the circuit judge. Her action was for damages received by slipping down upon ice which had accumulated upon a sidewalk. The negligence complained of related to the construction of the walk, whereby it is claimed that the accumulation of ice and snow was increased and made more dangerous than it would naturally have been upon a better located and constructed walk.

The fall occurred in the daytime, when, the plaintiff wras walking upon the sidewalk. She admits that she saw the ice before stepping upon the place where she fell; that she knew it was dangerous, but proceeded without taking hold of the hand rail, because she had a book and parcel in her hand, and was afraid that she would slip under the hand rail to the ground, a distance cf three or four feet below. It was not a case where to proceed was the only alternative. From her own statement she knew the walk was dangerous, yet chose to risk it. She testified that she thought there was as much danger in retracing her steps as in going on; but, if that is so, she should have retraced her steps earlier. Where a person actually sees the danger before the accident, there is as great reason for him to avoid it as there is for the municipality to provide against it beforehand. She could as well judge of the safety of this icy walk from its appearance at the time as the authorities could anticipate the danger when the walk was constructed. The allegation of her declaration that she was without fault is not supported by the evidence, and we think the judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bard v. Weathervane of Michigan
214 N.W.2d 709 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1974)
Vincent v. City of Detroit
177 N.W. 239 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Sherman v. Consumers' Power Co.
165 N.W. 844 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)
City of Colorado City v. Hunt
56 Colo. 336 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1914)
Highland v. Township of Garfield
134 N.W. 971 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Jefferson v. City of Sault Ste. Marie
130 N.W. 610 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Hunt v. Township of Douglass
130 N.W. 648 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Sargeant v. City of Detroit
120 N.W. 792 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Belyea v. City of Port Huron
99 N.W. 740 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
McTiver v. Township of Grant
91 N.W. 736 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1902)
Vergin v. City of Saginaw
84 N.W. 1075 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Howey v. Fisher
80 N.W. 1004 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Irion v. City of Saginaw
79 N.W. 572 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Grandorf v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.
71 N.W. 844 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Church v. President & Trustees
69 N.W. 651 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.W. 868, 107 Mich. 60, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-city-of-manistee-mich-1895.