Black v. Cecil Community College
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1974
CHERI BLACK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CECIL COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01182-RDB)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheri Black, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Jeanblanc Cohen, Eric J. Janson, SEYFARTH & SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Cheri Black appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her complaint alleging violations of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to e-17
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Black v. Cecil Cmty. Coll., No. 1:09-cv-01182-
RDB (D. Md. July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Black v. Cecil Community College (Black v. Cecil Community College) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.