Black v. Burrows

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Black v. Burrows

822 So. 2d 585, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11179, 2002 WL 1879957

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 2002·No. No. 1D02-1260·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of April 11, 2002, the Court has concluded that the counterclaim that remains pending below is related to the issues on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See S.L.T. Warehouse v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974).

In light of the dismissal, the appellants’ motion for extension of time to file the initial brief, filed on May 28, 2002, and amended motion for extension of time to file initial brief, filed on June 14, 2002, as well as the motion for extension of time to prepare the record, filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on May 29, 2002, are hereby denied as moot.

BARFIELD, MINER and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of April 11, 2002, the Court has concluded that the counterclaim that remains pending below is related to the issues on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See S.L.T. Warehouse v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974).

In light of the dismissal, the appellants’ motion for extension of time to file the initial brief, filed on May 28, 2002, and amended motion for extension of time to file initial brief, filed on June 14, 2002, as well as the motion for extension of time to prepare the record, filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on May 29, 2002, are hereby denied as moot.

BARFIELD, MINER and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Black v. Burrows, 822 So. 2d 585, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11179, 2002 WL 1879957 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

822 So. 2d 585 (Black v. Burrows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related