Black v. Black
229 S.E.2d 31, 290 N.C. 775, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1186
This text of 229 S.E.2d 31 (Black v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Black v. Black, 229 S.E.2d 31, 290 N.C. 775, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1186 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
Catherine B. BLACK
v.
James C. BLACK.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Waggoner, Hasty & Kratt, for plaintiff.
Warren C. Stack, Richard D. Stephens, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 403, 226 S.E.2d 858. Denied. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Black v. Black
226 S.E.2d 858 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 S.E.2d 31, 290 N.C. 775, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-black-nc-1976.