Black v. . Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Black v. . Black

150 S.E. 925, 198 N.C. 809, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 447

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 27, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 S.E. 925 (Black v. . Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Black v. . Black, 150 S.E. 925, 198 N.C. 809, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 447 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for alimony without divorce.

From an order awarding an allowance, the defendant appeals, assigning errors. The allegations of the complaint, which the judge finds to be true for the purposes of his order, are sufficient to warrant an *Page 810 allowance for the wife's necessary subsistence and counsel fees as authorized by C. S., 1667, as amended by chapter 123, Public Laws 1921, and chapter 52, Public Laws 1923.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out the facts in detail. SeeByerly v. Byerly, 194 N.C. 532, 140 S.E. 158; McManus v. McManus,191 N.C. 740, 133 S.E. 9; Price v. Price, 188 N.C. 640, 125 S.E. 264;Allen v. Allen, 180 N.C. 465, 105 S.E. 11.

The order will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI