Black v. Black

198 N.C. 809
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 27, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per CubiaM.

The allegations of the complaint, which the judge finds to be true for the purposes of his order, are sufficient to warrant an [810] allowance for tbe wife’s necessary subsistence and counsel fees as authorized by C. S., 1667, as amended by chapter 123, Public Laws 1921, and chapter 52, Public Laws 1923.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out the facts in detail. See Byerly v. Byerly, 194 N. C., 532, 140 S. E., 158; McManus v. McManus, 191 N. C., 740, 133 S. E., 9; Price v. Price, 188 N. C., 640, 125 S. E., 264; Allen v. Allen, 180 N. C., 465, 105 S. E., 11.

The order will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. Black, 198 N.C. 809 (N.C. 1929).

198 N.C. 809 (Black v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. . Goodman
161 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)