Black v. Black
This text of 713 N.W.2d 769 (Black v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summary Dispositions. The application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005, judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the portions of the Court of Appeals decision holding that the Manistee cabin was part of the marital estate and that plaintiff was not entitled to any portion of defendant's pension. The property division has now been reversed in its entirety. We remand this case to the Manistee Circuit Court for further *Page 858 proceedings, and direct the trial court to address the issues for which the Court of Appeals remanded the case and to also determine: (1) whether, in light of the antenuptial agreement, defendant intended to transfer his separate ownership interest in the Manistee cabin into the marital estate, and (2) whether defendant gifted plaintiff with an interest in his pension. In all other respects, the applications are denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 257650.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 N.W.2d 769, 475 Mich. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-black-mich-2006.