Black v. Beeler

Fourth Circuit

Black v. Beeler

77 F. App'x 658

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2003·No. 03-7129·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Black, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Black v. Beeler, No. CA-03-195-5-HO (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Black, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Black v. Beeler, No. CA-03-195-5-HO (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Black v. Beeler, 77 F. App'x 658 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

77 F. App'x 658 (Black v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related