Black v. Baltazar

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedOctober 28, 2019
Docket4:18-cv-00508
StatusUnknown

This text of Black v. Baltazar (Black v. Baltazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Baltazar, (D. Ariz. 2019).

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

11 William Russell Black, No. CV-18-00508-TUC-RM

12 Petitioner, ORDER

13 v.

14 Unknown Baltazar,

15 Respondent. 16 17 On September 19, 2019, Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman issued a Report and 18 Recommendation (Doc. 14) recommending that this Court deny Petitioner William 19 Russell Black’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the 20 merits. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. 21 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 22 magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 23 objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 24 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is 25 filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record 26 in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 27 advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 28 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the || district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for || clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation). 4 The Court has reviewed Judge Leslie A. Bowman’s Report and Recommendation, 5 || the parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Leslie A. Bowman’s || Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, 7 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted 8 || and adopted in full. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus || pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter 11 |} judgment accordingly and close this case. 12 Dated this 25th day of October, 2019. 13 14 piles □□ 16 ANGUL Bf Honorable Rostsiary □□□□□□□ 17 United States District □□□□□ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Black v. Baltazar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-baltazar-azd-2019.