Black v. Amen

352 U.S. 888, 77 S. Ct. 127
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 5, 1956
DocketNo. 346
StatusPublished

This text of 352 U.S. 888 (Black v. Amen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Amen, 352 U.S. 888, 77 S. Ct. 127 (1956).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to question 1 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:

“1. A question presented is whether a number of persons asserting separate and distinct demands as to which there were some common questions of law and fact, may intervene in a proceeding in a federal court, regardless of the citizenship of each intervener or other jurisdictional requirements, as the Court of Appeals held they might do, merely because the original plaintiff in this so-called spurious class action possessed the requisite jurisdictional requirements, including diversity of citizenship.”
Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 U.S. 888, 77 S. Ct. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-amen-scotus-1956.