Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC, Antonio Serna v. Petrosur, LLC

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
DecidedJune 9, 2026
Docket06-26-00055-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC, Antonio Serna v. Petrosur, LLC (Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC, Antonio Serna v. Petrosur, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC, Antonio Serna v. Petrosur, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-26-00055-CV

BLACK GOLD TEXAS TEA OIL, LLC, ANTONIO SERNA, Appellants

V.

PETROSUR, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court No. 24-05-07505

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 25, 2026, Appellants, Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC and Antonio Serna,

filed their notice of appeal in the Ninth Court of Appeals. 1 The trial court clerk’s record was due

to be filed with the appellate court on April 20, 2026. Appellants were not indigent and were

therefore responsible for payment of the fees for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1; 35.3(a)(2); 37.3(b).

Because the trial court clerk’s record was not received by April 20, 2026, the appellate

court clerk notified Appellants by letter that their appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution unless, by May 20, 2026, (1) Appellants provided proof that they had made

satisfactory arrangements with the trial court clerk’s office to pay the fee for the record, or

(2) Appellants filed a motion stating the facts they relied on to reasonably explain the need for

additional time to file the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b).

On May 20, 2026, the Montgomery County, Texas District Clerk informed this Court that

Appellants had neither made nor arranged payment for the preparation of the clerk’s record.

Furthermore, this Court has not received any response from Appellants to the April 20, 2026,

correspondence. Consequently, this appeal is ripe for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), (c);

42.3(b).

1 Originally appealed to the Ninth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.). 2 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b);

Charles van Cleef Justice

Date Submitted: June 8, 2026 Date Decided: June 9, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Black Gold Texas Tea Oil, LLC, Antonio Serna v. Petrosur, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-gold-texas-tea-oil-llc-antonio-serna-v-petrosur-llc-txctapp6-2026.