Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida

372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 1979
DocketNo. 78-2266
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 372 So. 2d 1011 (Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida, 372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause commenced upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to petitioner’s motion to amend the notice of appeal the cause has been treated as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. As such, certiorari is denied. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v, Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEÁD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Deerfield Beach v. FLA. NAT. BK. OF PALM BEACH CTY.
428 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-crow-eidsness-inc-v-asphalt-paving-co-of-florida-fladistctapp-1979.