Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida

372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1979·No. No. 78-2266·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause commenced upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to petitioner’s motion to amend the notice of appeal the cause has been treated as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. As such, certiorari is denied. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v, Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEÁD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida, 372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

372 So. 2d 1011 (Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Deerfield Beach v. FLA. NAT. BK. OF PALM BEACH CTY.
428 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)