Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida
This text of 372 So. 2d 1011 (Black, Crow & Eidsness, Inc. v. Asphalt Paving Co. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause commenced upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to petitioner’s motion to amend the notice of appeal the cause has been treated as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. As such, certiorari is denied. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v, Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 So. 2d 1011, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-crow-eidsness-inc-v-asphalt-paving-co-of-florida-fladistctapp-1979.