Black Creek, Inc. v. Wood

69 So. 3d 172, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 82, 2011 WL 1088574
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 25, 2011
Docket2071076
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 So. 3d 172 (Black Creek, Inc. v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black Creek, Inc. v. Wood, 69 So. 3d 172, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 82, 2011 WL 1088574 (Ala. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinions

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMAS, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

[173]*173See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.; Terry A. Moore, Alabama Workers’ Compensation § 20:47 (1998); Ex parte Wood, 69 So.3d 166 (Ala.2010); Weeks v. Herlong, 951 So.2d 670, 677 (Ala. 2006); Robbins v. Sanders, 927 So.2d 777, 785 (Ala.2005); Ex parte Fort James Operating Co., 895 So.2d 294, 297 (Ala.2004); Mobile Infirmary Med. Ctr. v. Hodgen, 884 So.2d 801, 808 (Ala.2003); Bleier v. Wellington Sears Co., 757 So.2d 1163, 1171 (Ala.2000); Motion Indus., Inc. v. Pate, 678 So.2d 724, 733 (Ala.1996); and Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Golson, 725 So.2d 996, 1000 (Ala.Civ.App.1998).

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN and BRYAN, JJ., concur. MOORE, J., concurs in the result, with writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guyoungtech USA, Inc. v. Dees
156 So. 3d 374 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 So. 3d 172, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 82, 2011 WL 1088574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-creek-inc-v-wood-alacivapp-2011.