B.K.T., Inc. v. South Florida Bank
This text of 658 So. 2d 1177 (B.K.T., Inc. v. South Florida Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants, B.K.T., Inc. and Paul W. and Marcia Levine, challenge several judgments entered in favor of the appellee, South Florida Bank, with regard to various mortgage foreclosures and other defaulted obligations. While we find no merit in the issues B.K.T. and the Levines raise on appeal, we remand the instant cause for correction of the final judgment entered in trial court case number 92-6489 CA-RWP.
At oral argument, counsel for South Florida Bank conceded that the principal amount of the monetary judgment entered in case number 92-6489 CA-RWP was miscalculated and improperly reflected as $98,000. The bank has informed this court that, instead, the correct amount of the judgment is approximately $15,500 plus interest.
Therefore, based on the foregoing, this case is remanded for corrections consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
658 So. 2d 1177, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8425, 1995 WL 467320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bkt-inc-v-south-florida-bank-fladistctapp-1995.