B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 2022
Docket22-1709
StatusPublished

This text of B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD,

Appellant, Case No. 5D22-1709 v. LT Case No. 2021-D- 00077- SH

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Decision filed November 7, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Laura Shaffer, Judge. Tiffany Gatesh Fearing, of Suncoast Legal Group, P.L. Spring Hill, for Appellant.

Kelly Schaeffer, of Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Desiree Erin Fernandez, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem

Donald Allen Mihokovich, of Adams and Reese, LLP Tampa, Pro Bono for the Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office Defending Best Interests Project

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SASSO, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
B.K., FATHER OF A.R., A CHILD vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bk-father-of-ar-a-child-vs-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2022.