Bjorseth v. City of Seattle
This text of 563 P.2d 1320 (Bjorseth v. City of Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On April 8, 1977, this court granted respondent Bjorseth's petition for rehearing. The rehearing involved only the cross-appeal asserted by Bjorseth and discussed by this court in Bjorseth v. Seattle, 15 Wn. App. 797, 802-03, 551 P.2d 1372 (1976). On rehearing, Bjorseth argued that the City of Seattle was, in fact, utilizing a residence preference system in determining which civil service employees would be promoted. The City admits this practice but pointed us to several provisions of the city charter which it says allow for preference in employment based on residence within the City of Seattle.1
[523]*523In reviewing these charter provisions, we are at a loss to see where any of the sections allow the City to engage in [524]*524the complained-of conduct. In fact, article 16, section 10, the main promotion provision, says nothing about residence in outlining procedures for promotion. As a result, we must agree with the respondent's position that the portion of the order granting summary judgment which states that "in all other respects the residency preferences . . . contained in the [city charter] . . . are hereby determined and declared to be valid and in full force and effect," should be reversed.
[525]*525Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 P.2d 1320, 17 Wash. App. 521, 1977 Wash. App. LEXIS 1601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bjorseth-v-city-of-seattle-washctapp-1977.