Bjorseth v. City of Seattle
Opinion
On April 8, 1977, this court granted respondent Bjorseth's petition for rehearing. The rehearing involved only the cross-appeal asserted by Bjorseth and discussed by this court in Bjorseth v. Seattle, 15 Wn. App. 797, 802-03, 551 P.2d 1372 (1976). On rehearing, Bjorseth argued that the City of Seattle was, in fact, utilizing a residence preference system in determining which civil service employees would be promoted. The City admits this practice but pointed us to several provisions of the city charter which it says allow for preference in employment based on residence within the City of Seattle.1
[523] In reviewing these charter provisions, we are at a loss to see where any of the sections allow the City to engage in [524] the complained-of conduct. In fact, article 16, section 10, the main promotion provision, says nothing about residence in outlining procedures for promotion. As a result, we must agree with the respondent's position that the portion of the order granting summary judgment which states that "in all other respects the residency preferences . . . contained in the [city charter] . . . are hereby determined and declared to be valid and in full force and effect," should be reversed.
[525] Reversed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
563 P.2d 1320 (Bjorseth v. City of Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.