B.J. Valve & Fitting Co. v. Elliott Valve Repair Co.
This text of 679 S.W.2d 1 (B.J. Valve & Fitting Co. v. Elliott Valve Repair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, B.J. Valve & Fitting Company, sued Elliott Valve Repair Company to recover damages for breach of an oral contract. After a non-jury trial, the trial court rendered judgment for B.J. Valve. The court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for Elliott based upon its conclusion that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the judgment. 675 S.W.2d 555.
The court of appeals’ decision is in conflict with Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Company, 619 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1981) and many other supreme court cases which hold that a court of appeals must remand a cause for new trial if it sustains an “insufficient evidence” point. Accordingly, we grant petitioner’s application for writ of error and without hearing argument, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Tex.R. Civ.P. 483.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 S.W.2d 1, 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 70, 1984 Tex. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bj-valve-fitting-co-v-elliott-valve-repair-co-tex-1984.