Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/B.J. v. State

B.J. v. State

558 So. 2d 536, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 1990 WL 37474
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1990
DocketNo. 89-274
StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 536 (B.J. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.J. v. State, 558 So. 2d 536, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 1990 WL 37474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, B.J., a juvenile, appeals an adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine, alleging it was reversible error for the trial court to exclude the testimony of a defense witness without conducting a Richardson inquiry. Based upon appellee State’s confession of error and our own review of this case, we reverse the adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine and remand for a new trial. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971); S.G. v. State, 518 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
S.G. v. State
518 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 536, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 1990 WL 37474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bj-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.