B.J. Carney Industries Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
200 F.3d 1222, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1402, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 969, 50 ERC (BNA) 1736, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1422
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in B.J. Carney Industries Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 F.3d 917 →
Opinion
ORDER
The parties have notified the court that the matter has been settled. In light of the settlement, Petitioner’s motion to withdraw the petition for rehearing and peti *1223 tion for rehearing en banc is GRANTED. The appeal is dismissed as MOOT. Our prior opinion, reported at 192 F.3d 917, is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B.J. Carney Industries Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 200 F.3d 1222, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1402, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 969, 50 ERC (BNA) 1736, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1422 (9th Cir. 2000).
200 F.3d 1222 (B.J. Carney Industries Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
B.J. Carney Industries Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
192 F.3d 917 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)