Bixman v. Bixman
85 P.2d 590, 149 Kan. 2, 1939 Kan. LEXIS 2
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bixman v. Bixman. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Kan. 597 →
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Appellant's motion for rehearing has been considered by the court and is overruled.
Our attention is called specifically to the fact that the attorney [3]*3who appeared for appellant in this court did not represent the appellant in the trial court. Since the judgment of the trial court, which we affirmed, rested largely on the opening statement of counsel, we might very well have noted the fact that there had been a change of counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bixman v. Bixman, 85 P.2d 590, 149 Kan. 2, 1939 Kan. LEXIS 2 (kan 1938).
85 P.2d 590 (Bixman v. Bixman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.