Bixly v. Mead
18 Wend. 321
This text of 18 Wend. 321 (Bixly v. Mead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bixly v. Mead, 18 Wend. 321 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1836).
Opinion
In this case property worth $1000 was bid in at a sheriff’s sale by a relative of the defendant, for the trifling sum of $26. The plaintiff applied to the court to set aside the sale and order a- re-sale. The plaintiff had employed an agent to attend the sale and bid in the property, but the agent had forgotten to attend. The defendant is insolvent. The motion was granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 Wend. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bixly-v-mead-nysupct-1836.