Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc.

188 So. 2d 293, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3357

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1966

DocketNo. 35342

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 2d 293 (Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc., 188 So. 2d 293, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3357 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Claimant’s motion for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI