Bivens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bivens v. State

813 So. 2d 963, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1412, 2002 WL 216429

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-4259

StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 963 (Bivens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bivens v. State, 813 So. 2d 963, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1412, 2002 WL 216429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla.2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla.2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

813 So. 2d 963, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1412, 2002 WL 216429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bivens-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack