Bitz v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bitz v. Feinberg

235 A.D. 816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 816 (Bitz v. Feinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bitz v. Feinberg, 235 A.D. 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, unless within five days from the entry of the order herein defendant Dorothy Feinberg stipulate that the verdict be increased to the sum of $1,000, in which event the judgment, as increased, is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant. We are of opinion that the verdict of the jury was inadequate. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, unless within five days from the entry of the order herein defendant Dorothy Feinberg stipulate that the verdict be increased to the sum of $1,000, in which event the judgment, as increased, is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant. We are of opinion that the verdict of the jury was inadequate. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bitz-v-feinberg-nyappdiv-1932.