Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams

56 S.E.2d 157, 80 Ga. App. 337, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 831

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 1, 1949

Docket32731.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 S.E.2d 157 (Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams, 56 S.E.2d 157, 80 Ga. App. 337, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, X

1. The evidence authorized the finding that the claimant, who was a first cousin of the deceased employee, was totally dependent upon the deceased at the time of his death. The fact that a daughter of the claimant gave the claimant sometimes fifty cents and sometimes a dollar, when she could spare it, would not require a finding of partial dependency only.

2. The State Board of Workmen’s Compensation did not err in not deducting the value of the deceased’s board and lodging, deceased having resided with the claimant and having been furnished meals by her, in computing the award of compensation. In cases of total dependency the amount of the award is not computed on the basis of the proportion of the actual amount of contributions to average weekly wages. Code, § 114-413 (b), (c). Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co., 71 Ga. App. 24 (29 S. E. 2d, 709) involved partial and not total dependency.

The court did not err in affirming the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C. J., and Wm-rill, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, X

1. The evidence authorized the finding that the claimant, who was a first cousin of the deceased employee, was totally dependent upon the deceased at the time of his death. The fact that a daughter of the claimant gave the claimant sometimes fifty cents and sometimes a dollar, when she could spare it, would not require a finding of partial dependency only.

2. The State Board of Workmen’s Compensation did not err in not deducting the value of the deceased’s board and lodging, deceased having resided with the claimant and having been furnished meals by her, in computing the award of compensation. In cases of total dependency the amount of the award is not computed on the basis of the proportion of the actual amount of contributions to average weekly wages. Code, § 114-413 (b), (c). Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co., 71 Ga. App. 24 (29 S. E. 2d, 709) involved partial and not total dependency.

The court did not err in affirming the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C. J., and Wm-rill, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.E.2d 157, 80 Ga. App. 337, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bituminous-casualty-corp-v-williams-gactapp-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack