Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Florida

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams

10 So. 2d 714, 152 Fla. 53, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 688

DecidedDecember 8, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 10 So. 2d 714 (Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Williams, 10 So. 2d 714, 152 Fla. 53, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 688 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us on petition for certiorari to review interlocutory orders under rule 34.

The orders complained of are, (1) order denying motion to dismiss bill of complaint; and (2) order denying motion to dissolve injunction, which injunction was granted without notice and without bond.

We, after consideration of the record in the light of briefs and oral argument, reach conclusion that the bill of complaint is not entirely without equity. We also reach the conclusion that to preserve the rights of the complainant, it reasonably appeared necessary to the chancellor to grant the injunction without notice and that, because of the circumstances as shown by the record, there was no reversible error in granting the injunction without bond.

It, therefore, follows that certiorari must be, and is, denied.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI