Bittson v. Bittson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bittson v. Bittson

283 A.D. 1079, 131 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1079 (Bittson v. Bittson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bittson v. Bittson, 283 A.D. 1079, 131 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In a separation action defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for the issuance of a commission to take his testimony and that of five named persons by way of written interrogatories in the Republic of Portugal. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant has stated, in his brief, that he does not press the appeal so far as witnesses other than himself are concerned. Insofar as his own testimony is concerned, the denial of the motion may not be said to be an improvident exercise of discretion, in view of the stipulation of counsel, which is recited in the order. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a separation action defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for the issuance of a commission to take his testimony and that of five named persons by way of written interrogatories in the Republic of Portugal. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant has stated, in his brief, that he does not press the appeal so far as witnesses other than himself are concerned. Insofar as his own testimony is concerned, the denial of the motion may not be said to be an improvident exercise of discretion, in view of the stipulation of counsel, which is recited in the order. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1079, 131 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bittson-v-bittson-nyappdiv-1954.